After not a very pleasant "
first encounter" of this 50mm lens, and not long after this, I got a call from a friend who is a mother to be in next few months. She called :"I want a lens ar, that can shoot with back ground blur blur one so I can take my baby photos lar, like you. And not very expensive one. But hor, I heard ar, this Sony DSLR ar, the lenses are very expensive one wor~~ How ar?" In other words, she wants a portrait lens with big aperture one.
I told her:"You are lucky. Sony just launched a considerbly cheap portrait lens, and it meets all the requirement you want. I can help you to find one as this lens is currently like a hot cake now (at the time of this post been typed lar.)"
So, after my not so pleasant first encounter, why I still recommend her this lens ? Because this is the lens that suit her requirement. Simple as that, period.
Then I paid a visit to the Sonystyle shop in The Curve, Damansara. When I asked a staff there about this SAL50F1.8 DT lens, he looked at me like I speak alien language to him. Being a good service salesperson in the shop, he went into the counter and bring out an Alpha catalogue and politely asked me which lens I want. I told him, this lens is just launched 2 weeks ago, and you can't see it in the catalogue. He looked confused and not understand what I am talking about. Finally, he went and asked his supervisor about my lens, and the answer I got is :"We don't have stock, but we can order for your from KLCC, and it'll take some days lar." He replied with a super white teeth good enough to become the model for Darlie.
Well, this is the 3rd time I go to Sonystyle, The Curve and everytime I wish to get something they say no stock one. WTF.
I'm not sure about others, but If I were the salesperson, I would advise the buyer to pay a visit to KLCC to get what he/she wants, since travelling from Damansara to KLCC wouldn't take much time, right ?
Anyway, I refused to place an order, and went to KLCC instead.
Then, I got the lens, and hence I had a small little time with this lens for me to do some extra test shots as my very own review of SAL50F1.8 DT.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e48fd/e48fd2b8b4e88675c34648ec496331f9f0fdcc37" alt=""
The box is pretty standard and small. Believe it or not, it's the last unit in KLCC when I got it for my friend!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34566/345668c8644a83d2aab45e1b5eea1f32a8d99831" alt=""
In the box come with the lens, real and front lens cap, instruction manuals in many many languages and a warranty card. The lens design is nice to my own standard. There is an AF-MF button, and the focusing distance (in metre and feet) scale printed on the focusing ring. When focus, the lens does not elongate. It's a SAM lens. SAM is the short form for Smooth Autofocus Motor, which means that this lens has a motor inside to assist on focusing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19219/192193af6f87069849a23e614814c2d770a0b28d" alt=""
The mount is a plastic mount, which is a bit cheapy for me. Take note that the real glass is actually protrude out from the lens barrier. Hence, it can't be mounted on a teleconverter to get the extra focal length.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69682/696824c9fbcb9e4d185dc334f7cf082b832b2905" alt=""
The front glass is actually built further deep into the lens. This explain why this lens does not need a lens hood. 49mm diameter lens mouth: we got problem finding a filter for this lens...... (too bad I just sold 2 of mine!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15b44/15b44831c616078c192bb2a1607f8a2dd315f85b" alt=""
And the lens is made in China! Well, there is a difficult task for me not to find anything around me that isn't made in China nowadays......
Since I have basically one night to do some simple test out of this lens, I did the wide open MFD sharpness test. With in-camera setting of sharpness set at 0, I took a shot of a stamp as shown here:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e73e/8e73e88b2969929054e1e3c633d8cd3b594dc6f5" alt=""
Straight out from camera, resize and watermarked. Not really on MFD at 0.34m as stated on the lens, but about 0.40m focusing distance to get this shot. It hunts a bit to get the focus lock, but with noisy SAM put on work, finding a suitable point to focus is not a problem for this lens.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fadc4/fadc47a00f3cfa2c6bcadb4b0af883132eb6b189" alt=""
Blow up of the stamp part. Well, sharpness wise, I think there is some rooms for improvement. Of course, this shot was done at F1.8.
Since this is a big aperture lens, so how's the bokeh part ? I'm not sure how to see if the bokeh is creamy or not, but I did these two shots just for fun: Meet Lego Spaceman : Yellowson !
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4510c/4510c6bc0bb081ddfd2241ef6c559b5bbe2604c2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc9df/fc9dfa68ff7080f2644c8ac9cf5ea43a7645a7c3" alt=""
Ok what... right ? Oh, these two shots are not crop shots. With about 1:4 magnification from this lens, shooting Yellowson in real life shouldn't be a problem. LOL.
Now come the flare part. I'm not sure if the way I test the lens flare is correct or not. What I did is placing a flash with a softbox just make like sun-light, and I point my lens towards the "sun".
So, first shot :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/705b8/705b83e98d0a4e59effd4670e80288c1d455fe88" alt=""
Hmm.... the flare control is quite impressive. There is a slightly ghosting on top of that pic, but not noticeable. This is very good already to my standard lar. Then I took another shot again with this time including the "sun" in the pic :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb876/fb8764386acabd45a52a1a020e27a99daa0e4e97" alt=""
Ooooo.... pretty impressive I would say. The flare from the "sun" is basically not visible in the pic ! That why this lens doesn't come with a hood, because it doesn't need one.
Let's compare a lens that is so famous and everyone thinks it's a super good "God" lens that bears a blue label on it one and see how the flare control. Same focal length, shutter speed and aperture:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c88/21c886c6cd03063f85c96199e26c40f78802bed0" alt=""
OMG !!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cefe6/cefe6d0f44e83f75d4219fba169210c43a2f90d8" alt=""
!!!!!
What lens is that ? Hmm.. I shall remain silent. LOL. Well, good also what, at least there is artistic touch about it, no ? LOL
And finally, how heavy is this lens ? Very light :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d032/9d0323936d3cec845012e4dcf9da348cc20fa1b8" alt=""
So light that when mounted on my camera like nothing on it ! LOL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29311/2931106cbc4c2e11ed733bcb5aeabaeab7002565" alt=""
But it's still heavier than my spacemen collection. LOL.
So, here are my very own personal conclusion about this lens:
1) It's a prime for sure.
2) Price wise, I do feel it should be sold cheaper than the current RM 599.00 RRP. But it's still lot cheaper than SAL50F1.4.
3) Plastic built. Very cheap feel....
4) It's a F1.8 lens, so, it's a fast lens and a great portrait lens.
5) Focusing is fast, but SAM is damn noisy.
6) It's light weight ! A very great travel lens. (No law says 50mm can't be a travel lens.)
7) It's quite sharp. If in-camera sharpness +3, the result is very sharp !
8) I don't know if this is a good replacement for 50mm F1.7, but if I have a 50mm F1.7, do I need a plastic SAL50F1.8 DT lens?
And I end my review with a sample shot at KLCC when I got this lens from the store:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f73c/4f73c9806f12097dc45f040bc29b4c74fc883080" alt=""
Well, as I said, this lens is a portrait lens, and it does what it does. :)
Did I mentioned that this isn't my lens ?
My first review
here.